Access types determine the conditions under which users can access and use the content. Subscribed means users need to be logged-in. OA and Free means users need not be logged-in.
AUP business models have three types of access
The platform supports four types of access
I have no idea how 3 is done.
The access type is included in the XML - both JATS and BITS - through <license>
and its @license-type
attribute in the <permissions>
element.
Omit <license>
from <permissions>
.
Example from 10.5117.ANTW2023.1.007.LEEZ
:
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© Michiel Leezenberg</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Michiel Leezenberg</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
Use “free” or “FREE” as the value of the @license-type attribute.
Example from 10.5117.ANTW2023.1.001.DORR
:
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© Steven Dorrestijn & Herman Westerink</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Steven Dorrestijn & Herman Westerink</copyright-holder>
<license license-type="free"><license-p></license-p></license>
</permissions>
Use “open-access” or “OPEN-ACCESS” as the value of the @license-type attribute. Also, add a link to the appropriate Creative Commons license using the @xlink:href attribute.
Example from 10.5117.QUE2022.1.001.KLEI
:
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© Ru Klein</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ru Klein</copyright-holder>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
This is displayed as follows on the platform:
© Ru Klein. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
How to setp up a free trial on Edify?
This document outlines the process of setting up free trials in Ingenta Edify through the site administration tools. Free Trials can be set up at multiple levels e.g., for individual issues or articles, or at journal level for all issues under the journal etc. The steps below refer to setting up a free trial for an article, but they can be used at other levels too.
The option to sign up for a free trial will be visible on the homepage of the relevant content item(s). As an example, a link to sign up trial set up for an issue will be displayed on the homepage of the issue. Please see the screenshot below for an example of the trial sign-up link on an article page.
<permissions>
These elements are NOT nested and NOT (?) mandatory.
<copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>
The copyright statement is displayed below the abstract (or one-page PDF if there is no abstract) on the article or chapter page. Copyright year and copyright holder are NOT displayed. Make sure to include that information in the copyright statement.
Is this a fourth kind of license? It certainly introduces a new tag:
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© Maria Vlaar</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Maria Vlaar</copyright-holder>
<license><ali:license_ref content-type="open-access" start_date="2023-07-05" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref></license>
</permissions>
The idea is to make the content publicly accessible after a certain period. The start date is in the XML. The XML does not say what license type is applicable before that time.
JATS has several elements that deal with the usage, permissions, and licensing. Some of these elements are taken from the NISO Access and License Indicators (ALI) 2015 Recommended Practice specification. The other element is JATS-specific and predates the NISO recommendation:
<ali:free_to_read>
— This NISO ALI element is a simple flag whose presence indicates that the document is free-to-read, without making statements about any additional reuse rights or restrictions. Date attributes can specify when the document is free to be read.<ali:license_ref>
— This NISO ALI element points to a public license or waiver. By “public”, NISO means that the offer is generally and not privately offered. Such a license may be either human or machine-readable text that explains the terms of use or reuse for the content.<license>
— A JATS-specific element whose content describes a set of conditions under which the content may be used, accessed, and distributed. This element was provided to hold the license text. The 2015 NISO ALI recommendation is to store in the XML document a URI that points to the license instead of the full license text. For users who adopt the NISO ALI recommendation, the <license>
element could be used to hold a short representation of the license, a sentence or two to be used for display. Alternatively, a publisher could choose not to implement NISO ALI and to put the text of the license in <license>
. The <license>
element takes the @xlink:href
attribute to point to the text of the license. However, the new NISO ALI element <ali:license_ref>
performs the same pointing function. JATS best practice is to omit the @xlink:href
attribute from <license>
if a NISO ALI <ali:license_ref>
is used.This text seems to suggest <ali:license_ref>
is the preferred tag for all our license, in which case we would need to retag and reupload all content…
In fact, I believe we have to. Look at this example from NLM:
<license>
<ali:license_ref
start_date="2014-02-03"
xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">
http://www.psychoceramics.org/license_v1.html</ali:license_ref>
<ali:license_ref
start_date="2015-02-03"
xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ali:license_ref>
</license>
At first, content is under a proprietary license (initial publication) and then, a year later, under a CC BY license. Note how both licenses are explicitly stated. This is different from how AUP does it, where the Subscribed-to license is implicit. So we have to make the Subscribed-to license explicit!